Call of Duty vs Battlefield: Which Franchise is Better and Why?
Two known franchises have dominated the video game industry for years when it comes to first-person shooter games: Call of Duty and Battlefield. These games have developed a fan base, sparked a great deal of debate, and left us wondering which one is better. To help you decide which franchise best fits your gaming preferences, we will compare and contrast the Call of Duty and Battlefield universes in this article.
The Legacy of Call of Duty
Call of Duty, also known as COD, made its debut in the gaming industry in 2003. Since its arrival, it has been able to grab the attention of the masses. The number of fans in the Call of Duty community kept increasing with the release of a new game.
It is crucial to give some credit to the developer and publisher of Call of Duty for its popularity. It was developed by Infinity Ward and published by Activision. The reason behind the success of Call of Duty is the active development team. They always valued the players’ feedback and brought necessary updates with time.
Another reason behind the increasing popularity of Call of Duty is the addition of a new game to the series every year. The franchise delivered a wide range of top-notch games, from World War II to Modern Warfare and everything in between. Following are a few reasons why we think Call of Duty has been so successful:
Consistency and Frequency
The one distinguishing quality that gives Call of Duty an upper hand over other games is its annual release schedule. The new releases and updates keep Call of Duty fans wondering what’s next. The developers bring in new content and gameplay innovations every year to keep the Call of Duty fanbase intact. The updates make the game look fresh and enable the player to explore the game further.
Engaging Multiplayer
Multiplayer mode is the most popular part of Call of Duty. Professional players rate this mode as legendary. The player believes its fast-paced action, tight gunplay, and customizable load-outs keep them engaged. The Call of Duty multiplayer mode makes the game more competitive.
After the release of the multiplayer mode in Call of Duty, there was an increase in competitive tournaments worldwide. The multiplayer mode gave professional teams an effective way to train for upcoming events. Similarly, the franchise presented "Zombies" and "Warzone" modes added depth and variety to its multiplayer section.
Captivating Single-Player Campaigns
Over the years, Call of Duty fans have witnessed memorable single-player campaigns. The developers put too much effort into giving the campaigns a Hollywood-style plot and tremendous combat scenes. With their captivating missions and cinematic storytelling, games like “Modern Warfare” and “Black Ops” have had gamers on the edge of their seats.
The Battlefield Experience
The only worthy opponent that can face the Call of Duty franchise is the Battlefield franchise. It was created by DICE and published by Electronic Arts (EA). Similar to Call of Duty, Battlefield has a huge fanbase. The developers kept the fans engaged by presenting large-scale battles, destructible environments, and an emphasis on team-based gameplay. Following are some reasons that we believe brought Battlefield to the list of top FPS games:
Epic Scale Battles
If you want to spend some time fighting an epic battle on a huge map, you should go for the Battlefield franchise. If you have a big friend circle who wants to join the fight with you, you can get this unique experience with Battlefield. It allows your friends to join you and fight against dozens of enemies. The distinguishing features of this game are large-scale battles, massive maps, and player counts.
Destructible Environments
The feature that remained the talk of the town after Battlefield's release was its destructible environments. Fans were excited to jump into the battle and destroy everything in their path. This feature allows players to level buildings, create new pathways, and change the battleground dynamically. The introduction of this feature brought realism to the game. With a destructible environment, the team can devise a strategy and alter the terrain to their advantage.
Call of Duty vs Battlefield: The Showdown
We have gone through the strengths of both Call of Duty and Battlefield. Now, we will dive into the comparison between gameplay, graphics, and modes. If you follow this article, you will be able to decide which game suits you the best.
Gameplay Style
Call of Duty: gameplay focuses on run-and-gun with tight gun mechanics. Overall, it has fast-paced gameplay. If you prefer playing the game solo and have good reflexes, Call of Duty is the game for you.
Battlefield: presents gameplay focused on slow-paced movements. However, it involves tactical gameplay with an emphasis on teamwork. This game is perfect for those players who strategize and prefer large-scale battles.
Graphics and Sound Design
Call of Duty: The one thing the Call of Duty developers never compromise on is its stunning graphics and immersive sound design. They try their best to deliver a cinematic experience to the players.
Battlefield: If we talk about Battlefield graphics, it has set the bar high for its competitors. It presents realistic visuals and extraordinary soundscapes.
Campaign vs Multiplayer
Call of Duty: The Call of Duty developers divided their focus on both campaign and multiplayer modes. Surprisingly, they delivered two flawless modes for their users.
Battlefield: Battlefield became popular because of its multiplayer mode. However, after recent updates, its campaign mode has also started to attract FPS gamers.
Conclusion
In this guide, we have discussed the strengths of both games. When these two magnificent franchises come face-to-face, we can’t decide which one has the upper hand. However, it depends on your gaming preferences. If you prefer a game that tests your reflexes, Call of Duty is definitely the way to go. However, if you’re a player who strategizes a lot and prefers a destructible environment, go for Battlefield. For more amazing guides, follow Esports Driven.
